CANADIAN ORDERS ONLY AT THIS TIME
FOR LABORATORY RESEARCH ONLY
MGMT RESEARCH / COMPOUND COMPARISON

Sources checked · 29 October 2026

Retatrutide vs. Semaglutide vs. Tirzepatide

Compare receptor mechanisms, study populations and trial outcomes. Learn which results come from a direct comparison and which come from separate studies.

Editorial source check, not a systematic review or clinical peer review. Journal publications, sponsor reports and official labeling are identified in the source list.

Semaglutide / GLP-1Tirzepatide / GLP-1 + GIPRetatrutide / GLP-1 + GIP + Glucagon

Clinical results below concern the medicines and investigational formulations studied in trials. MGMT Research vial images show our laboratory research packaging; those products are separate from branded medicines and trial supplies. Trial outcomes do not establish outcomes for an MGMT Research product.

Brunette researcher in an MGMT Research lab coat comparing 12 MGMT-branded vials: four each of RETROD, TIREZ, and SEMARO on a laboratory desk, with a softly blurred lab background
KEY TAKEAWAYS

Three profiles. Different evidence.

01

Semaglutide

Single GLP-1 receptor agonism. STEP 1 reported 14.9% mean weight loss at 68 weeks. SELECT reported a hazard ratio of 0.80 for major cardiovascular events in adults with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity, without diabetes. [1] [5]

02

Tirzepatide

Dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonism. SURMOUNT-1 reported 20.9% at 15 mg using the treatment-regimen estimand, or 22.5% using the efficacy estimand. SURMOUNT-5 directly compared it with Semaglutide: 20.2% versus 13.7% at 72 weeks. [2] [3]

03

Retatrutide

Triple GIP/GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonism. The published TRIUMPH-1 trial reported 25.0% mean weight reduction at 80 weeks in its 12 mg group using the treatment-regimen analysis. Retatrutide remains investigational. [21] [14]

Read the trial, not just the percentage.

Different populations, durations, doses, and statistical approaches can change the result. A larger number from a separate trial is not proof of superiority in a head-to-head comparison.

THE EVOLUTION OF INCRETIN RESEARCH

How each compound works.

Single, dual, and triple agonism describe the number of receptor systems engaged. They are useful ways to explain the development of this research family, rather than official “generation” classifications.

GLP-1 / shared foundation

GLP-1 receptor activity contributes to glucose-dependent insulin secretion, appetite regulation, and delayed gastric emptying. Semaglutide acts selectively at this receptor. [12]

GIP / the second pathway

Tirzepatide and Retatrutide also engage GIPR. Research examines how GIP and GLP-1 activity interact in insulin secretion, adipose metabolism, and energy balance.

Glucagon / the third pathway

Retatrutide adds GCGR activity. Glucagon can increase hepatic glucose production; combined agonism is being studied for effects on energy expenditure and lipid metabolism. Mechanistic explanations remain model-dependent.

Mechanism references: [15] [16]. Weekly injection formulations were used in the trials summarized here; oral Semaglutide formulations also exist. [12]

MGMT Research TIREZ 10 mg vial packaging concept
MGMT RESEARCH / TIREZ

Dual receptor research.

Tirzepatide is the proper compound name. TIREZ is the name used on our vial packaging.

Tirzepatide product detailsLaboratory research packaging concept.
SIDE BY SIDE

The evidence at a glance.

Scroll horizontally to view the full comparison on smaller screens.

Selected clinical evidence. Separate trials are not direct comparisons.
CategorySemaglutideTirzepatideRetatrutide
Receptor targetsGLP-1RGLP-1R + GIPRGLP-1R + GIPR + GCGR
Medicine brand namesOzempic, Wegovy, RybelsusMounjaro, ZepboundInvestigational; no approved medicine brand
Selected weight-loss trial14.9% / 68 weeks
STEP 1; 2.4 mg [1]
20.9% / 72 weeks
SURMOUNT-1; 15 mg, treatment-regimen estimand
22.5% efficacy estimand [2]
25.0% / 80 weeks
TRIUMPH-1; 12 mg, treatment-regimen estimand
3.9% with placebo [21]
Direct comparison / SURMOUNT-513.7% at 72 weeks20.2% at 72 weeksNot included in SURMOUNT-5 [3]
Glucose-control exampleA1C −1.86 percentage points in SURPASS-2, 1 mg; 40 weeks, type 2 diabetesA1C −2.30 percentage points in SURPASS-2, 15 mg; 40 weeks, type 2 diabetes [4]TRIUMPH-2: sponsor-reported efficacy analysis at 80 weeks; A1C −1.5 percentage points at 12 mg, −1.6 at 9 mg [8]
Liver research62.9% MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis / ESSENCE62% MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis at 15 mg / SYNERGY-NASH86% relative liver-fat reduction at 12 mg / Phase 2a
Different endpoint [9] [10] [11]
Cardiovascular outcomesSELECT: hazard ratio 0.80 for MACE vs. placeboSURPASS-CVOT: noninferior to Dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes and established ASCVDDedicated outcomes research ongoing; no established cardiovascular event reduction [5] [17] [18]
Clinical statusApproved medicines; indications vary by product and jurisdictionApproved medicines; indications vary by product and jurisdictionInvestigational; Lilly announced a planned Q1 2027 US submission, not an approval date [14] [19]

Trial doses describe study arms, not dosing instructions. Brand names belong to their respective owners. MGMT Research is not affiliated with those medicine manufacturers.

WEIGHT-LOSS RESULTS

What the trials actually show.

Semaglutide / STEP 1

14.9% at 68 weeks

In 1,961 adults without diabetes, Semaglutide 2.4 mg produced 14.9% mean weight loss versus 2.4% with placebo, alongside lifestyle intervention. [1]

Tirzepatide / SURMOUNT-1

20.9% at 72 weeks

The 15 mg arm produced 20.9% mean weight loss versus 3.1% with placebo using the treatment-regimen estimand. The efficacy estimate was 22.5%; the two figures answer different statistical questions. [2]

Retatrutide / TRIUMPH-1

25.0% at 80 weeks

In 2,339 adults with obesity without diabetes, the 12 mg group had 25.0% mean weight reduction versus 3.9% with placebo in the published treatment-regimen analysis. [21]

These are selected trial results, not a three-way head-to-head ranking. An efficacy estimand generally estimates the effect if treatment is taken as planned; a treatment-regimen estimand incorporates treatment discontinuation according to the study’s analysis plan.

DIRECT EVIDENCE / SURMOUNT-5

20.2% versus 13.7%.

SURMOUNT-5 randomized 751 adults with obesity without diabetes in an open-label trial of maximum tolerated tirzepatide 10/15 mg or semaglutide 1.7/2.4 mg. It did not compare every current formulation or dose. At 72 weeks, mean weight reduction was 20.2% with tirzepatide and 13.7% with semaglutide: a 6.5-percentage-point difference. Retatrutide was not included. [3]

Only the two SURMOUNT-5 groups appear in this chart. The retatrutide results elsewhere on this page come from separate trials and cannot establish a three-way ranking.

Retatrutide: different populations and analyses

The 2023 phase 2 trial reported 24.2% mean weight reduction at 48 weeks in its 12 mg group. The published TRIUMPH-2 trial in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes reported 18.8% versus 5.1% with placebo at 80 weeks using the treatment-regimen analysis. These are different study populations. [20] [22]

Sponsor reports also give efficacy-estimand results: 28.3% for TRIUMPH-1 and 20.8% for TRIUMPH-2 at 12 mg. Those estimates use different assumptions from the published treatment-regimen figures above; they should not be silently substituted for them. [7] [8]

Read the 24- and 48-week phase 2 results or explore longer follow-up and extension limits.

MGMT Research RETROD 20 mg vial packaging concept
MGMT RESEARCH / RETROD

Triple receptor research.

RETROD is our vial label name for Retatrutide. The clinical evidence in this guide relates to the trial formulations, not our packaging concept.

Retatrutide product detailsLaboratory research packaging concept.
LIVER RESEARCH

Fat reduction and MASH resolution
measure different things.

MASLD describes metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. MASH includes steatohepatitis, involving inflammation and liver injury. Reducing liver fat on imaging is not the same endpoint as resolving MASH on biopsy.

Semaglutide / ESSENCE

In the planned 72-week interim analysis of 800 participants with biopsy-defined MASH and F2/F3 fibrosis, MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis occurred in 62.9% with semaglutide versus 34.3% with placebo. [9]

Tirzepatide / SYNERGY-NASH

This phase 2 trial enrolled 190 participants with biopsy-confirmed MASH and F2/F3 fibrosis. At 52 weeks, 62% of the 15 mg group met MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis, versus 10% with placebo. Missing endpoint biopsies were handled by imputation. [10]

Retatrutide / Phase 2a

At 48 weeks, the 12 mg group showed an 86% mean relative liver-fat reduction; 93% reached liver fat below 5%. Only 43.9% of the substudy participants had liver-fat measurements available at week 48. These imaging results do not establish MASH resolution or fibrosis improvement. [11]

Glucagon receptor activity provides a biological rationale for studying Retatrutide’s hepatic lipid effects. It does not prove that one receptor alone caused the clinical result, or that Retatrutide is superior to the others for liver outcomes.

CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES

Weight loss is not an outcomes trial.

SELECT studied Semaglutide in adults with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity, without diabetes. Major cardiovascular events occurred in 6.5% versus 8.0% with placebo: a hazard ratio of 0.80 (20% lower relative hazard), with a 1.5-percentage-point difference in observed event proportions. The hazard ratio and raw event proportions are different measures. [5]

SURPASS-CVOT studied Tirzepatide against Dulaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and met noninferiority; superiority was not established. This active-comparator study answers a different question from SELECT. [17]

Retatrutide’s dedicated TRIUMPH-Outcomes study is evaluating cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. Weight reduction, blood pressure changes, and lipid changes are not proof of fewer heart attacks or strokes. [18]

SAFETY & TOLERABILITY

Shared symptoms.
Different trial contexts.

Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation are common in incretin trials, often during dose escalation. Rates from separate trials cannot establish which compound is better tolerated. Formulation, dose, population, and adverse-event collection methods differ.

Retatrutide / TRIUMPH-4 safety signal

At 12 mg, nausea was reported in 43.2%, vomiting in 20.9%, and dysesthesia in 20.9% versus 0.7% with placebo for dysesthesia. Dysesthesia refers to altered or unpleasant skin sensations. Adverse-event discontinuation was 18.2% at 12 mg versus 4.0% with placebo. These are TRIUMPH-4-specific observations from the cited sponsor report. [6]

The cited U.S. Wegovy and Zepbound prescribing labels include pancreatitis, gallbladder disease, dehydration-related kidney injury, and thyroid C-cell tumor warnings. These concerns are not unique to only one compound. The human relevance of the rodent thyroid findings is uncertain; a normal thyroid-function panel does not screen for medullary thyroid carcinoma. [12] [13]

Retatrutide remains investigational, with ongoing safety evaluation and no approved prescribing information. Medicine selection and monitoring require a clinician’s assessment of the individual’s history, other medicines, and treatment goals.

CLINICIAN-DIRECTED MONITORING

Follow the relevant medicine label.

The cited U.S. labels support monitoring tied to clinical circumstances. Wegovy labeling directs blood-glucose monitoring in people with type 2 diabetes; both labels address kidney-function monitoring when adverse reactions could cause dehydration. [12] [13]

These labels do not provide a universal blood-test panel or a fixed three- or six-month schedule for every person. A clinician or trial team chooses follow-up for the actual medicine, medical history and symptoms. Approved-medicine labeling does not establish a monitoring plan or safe-use period for MGMT research materials.

QUESTIONS THAT REMAIN

Evidence continues to evolve.

Semaglutide has a longer clinical history and placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcomes evidence in the SELECT population. SURMOUNT-5 found greater mean weight reduction with tirzepatide than semaglutide at the doses studied. Retatrutide has encouraging Phase 3 results, but cross-trial percentages do not settle its comparative benefits or long-term safety.

Lilly announced plans for a US Retatrutide submission in Q1 2027. A submission is not an approval or launch date, and timelines can change. Retatrutide had not been approved by any regulatory agency at this review date. [14] [19]

PRIMARY SOURCES

Follow the evidence.

Selected primary references checked for this comparison. Source types distinguish journal publications from sponsor reports and official labeling. Some publisher full texts were unavailable; their original abstracts and official reports were checked. Figures are rounded where indicated.

  1. Peer-reviewed trialWilding et al. STEP 1 — semaglutide and body weight. NEJM, 2021. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032183.
  2. Peer-reviewed trialJastreboff et al. SURMOUNT-1 — tirzepatide and body weight. NEJM, 2022. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206038.
  3. Peer-reviewed trialAronne et al. SURMOUNT-5 — tirzepatide versus semaglutide. NEJM, 2025. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2416394.
  4. Peer-reviewed trialFrías et al. SURPASS-2 — type 2 diabetes. NEJM, 2021. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107519.
  5. Peer-reviewed trialLincoff et al. SELECT — cardiovascular outcomes. NEJM, 2023. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307563.
  6. Sponsor reportLilly. TRIUMPH-4 — obesity and knee osteoarthritis. December 2025. Sponsor-reported results.
  7. Sponsor reportLilly. TRIUMPH-1 — efficacy analysis and selected extension. May 2026. Sponsor-reported results.
  8. Sponsor reportLilly. TRIUMPH-2 — efficacy analysis. September 2026. Sponsor-reported results.
  9. Peer-reviewed trialSanyal et al. ESSENCE — semaglutide and MASH. NEJM, 2025. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2413258.
  10. Peer-reviewed trialLoomba et al. SYNERGY-NASH — tirzepatide and MASH. NEJM, 2024. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2401943.
  11. Peer-reviewed substudySanyal et al. Retatrutide and liver fat — phase 2a substudy. Nature Medicine, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03018-2.
  12. U.S. prescribing informationWegovy — official U.S. prescribing information on DailyMed.
  13. U.S. prescribing informationZepbound — official U.S. prescribing information.
  14. Manufacturer status informationLilly. Retatrutide investigational status. Updated October 2026.
  15. Primary receptor researchWillard et al. Tirzepatide receptor signaling. JCI Insight, 2020. DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.140532.
  16. Primary receptor researchCoskun et al. Retatrutide discovery and receptor pharmacology. Cell Metabolism, 2022.
  17. Peer-reviewed trialNicholls et al. SURPASS-CVOT — tirzepatide versus dulaglutide. NEJM, 2025. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2505928.
  18. Ongoing trial informationTRIUMPH-Outcomes — cardiovascular and kidney outcomes study. NCT06383390.
  19. Sponsor announcementLilly. Planned regulatory submission. July 2026; an announced plan, not an approval.
  20. Peer-reviewed trialJastreboff et al. Retatrutide phase 2 obesity trial. NEJM, 2023. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301972.
  21. Peer-reviewed trialJastreboff et al. TRIUMPH-1 — published 80-week trial. NEJM, 2026. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2604169.
  22. Peer-reviewed trialBellido et al. TRIUMPH-2 — obesity and type 2 diabetes. The Lancet, 2026. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)01861-1.

This comparison is educational and does not provide treatment or dosing advice. MGMT Research products are for laboratory research only, not for human consumption or diagnostic or therapeutic use.

MGMT RESEARCH

Your cart

Subtotal

Prices are in CAD. Tax and shipping are calculated at checkout.

Continue to checkout

E-transfer accepted. Credit cards coming soon.